Talk:Crime in Los Angeles

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 August 2018 and 11 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anthony.Tostado.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:39, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

Someone should put these things:

  • the crack cocaine in 80s and 90s
  • the CRASH anti-gang unit (and their alleged corruption)
  • Watts riots and 1992 riots
  • South Central LA
  • Skid Row
  • crime in other cities in Greater LA area (if you deem it fit)Admiral Norton 18:17, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
DONE................ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.130.9.224 (talk) 06:28, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment[edit]

this is stupid.los angeles murders have only decreased.you put the murders from the entire los angeles county in 2006 compared to the murders in the city ALONE.trying to make it seem like murders increased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.149.17.245 (talk) 00:34, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The 90s"[edit]

"In 2005, Los Angeles reported 489 murders, a major decrease from the 90s which 1,096 murders were reported."

What year is this article talking about? does it mean the decade as a whole? I think not. 206.113.132.130 (talk) 01:11, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its talking about 1992, thats the highest number of homicides recorded in 1 year in L.A. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.185.95 (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Outline for improvment[edit]

Okay, I have no background knowledge on this subj., but I can help, because this article is in terrible shape. The first problem with the info on this page is the way it's organized and presented, It's like each section is a spicific riot, with subtle details about the situation as a whole interwoven.To make it good, let's
1 organize the article by years/periods
and subdivide each section further into
a.major trends,
b.very major events, and
c.the police's reaction to stuff, etc.
Rustyfence (talk) 03:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If I have time, I can waork to improve the article. It will take time and research, but it can be done. --Moreau36 (talk) 22:20, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Crime in Los Angeles/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This article pretty much looks like a list of stubs. The sections should be longer and have a more natural order, instead of being totally unrelated to each other, both in subject and in timespan. Admiral Norton (talk) 21:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Substituted at 18:13, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crime in Los Angeles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Topic is too broad. Break it apart.[edit]

This article read like a summary of the topic it was supposed to cover. And a badly written summary. Can we go more in depth? Maybe chronologically? By neighborhood? Surely there is much much more to say than this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.56.31.133 (talk) 12:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]