Talk:Crowes railway line

Australia: Victoria / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Crowes railway line is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article lacks references.
	It is requested that an a map be included in this article to improve its quality. Please work with the Maps task force to create and add a map to this article.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that Crowes railway station be merged into Crowes railway line. The former article consists of just two sentences and an infobox, and it cites no sources nor does it indicate notability. --Novarupta (talk) 13:56, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The line had more than twenty stations and it was a substantial terminus. Crowes railway station needs expansion, not quasi-deletion. The Drover's Wife (talk) 17:13, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. I agree with The Drover's Wife that it needs expansion. There is a lot more info that can be added, as it was a terminus, it had a number of facilities its current status, etc. Supt. of Printing (talk) 06:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll remove the merge tags then. --Novarupta (talk) 09:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crowes railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080802234330/http://www.colacotway.vic.gov.au//Files/BLCMS.pdf to http://www.colacotway.vic.gov.au/Files/BLCMS.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]