Talk:Crowne Plaza Hotel Billings

Montana Low‑importance

	Montana portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montana, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Montana on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontanaWikipedia:WikiProject MontanaTemplate:WikiProject MontanaMontana articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

RfC - Should the Crowne Plaza Hotel Billings be categorised as a skyscraper?[edit]

The consensus is against categorising Crowne Plaza Hotel Billings as a skyscraper. Cunard (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Resolved

Should the Crowne Plaza Hotel Billings be categorised as a skyscraper? Dlabtot (talk) 15:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Oppose, According to Wikipedia's skyscraper article, a skyscraper has at least 40 floors. This building has 22. Dlabtot (talk) 15:42, 10 April 2017 (UTC) Also, Wikipedia content must be verifiable to a reliable source. Absent a reliable source that describes this building as a skyscraper, it's not our job to do so. Dlabtot (talk) 05:24, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK to use the term (invited by the bot) The statement from the Wikipedia article looks cherrypicked, mis-summarized and removed from context. And Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia. The definitions seem to allow for this to be called a skyscraper and emphasize that use of the title takes into consideration the buildings around it. Note that my comment said it was OK to use the term....does not mean that it is the best choice. I tend to say to lean away from "characterization" type terms when they are contested. North8000 (talk) 19:38, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest NOT wiki-categorizing it as a skyscraper In response to the clarification below, wiki-categorizing is a broader non-local context.North8000 (talk) 18:06, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No. The building should not be categorized as a skyscraper. Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 20:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Threaded discussion[edit]

I don't consider buildings under 40 floors to be skyscrapers. Encylopedia Brittanica says most other people don't either. https://www.britannica.com/technology/skyscraper . I believe the term "high-rise" is more in line with more readers' terminology. Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 20:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whether sources refer to this building a skyscraper or not is irrelevant. Wikipedia gets its facts from sources, but not its language. Sources will tell us how many floors the building has, but not what word we should use to describe that height. Of course, examples from other English writing will tell us what common English usage is, but that writing wouldn't have to be about this building in particular. Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 20:26, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

North8000, Bryan Henderson (giraffedata), just to be clear, the question is not 'what words should be used to describe the building in the article?', but rather, 'should the building be placed in the Wikipedia category "Skyscrapers in Montana"?' Dlabtot (talk) 22:34, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops. Yeah, I didn't get that at all from the stated question. I think you should reword the question if that's what you want comments on. I don't think anyone would mind if you just closed this RfC and started over. Or you could just modify this one if you prefer. Bryan Henderson (giraffedata) (talk) 01:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Summary[edit]

In absense of WP:RS and failing to comply with the definition of a sky-scraper, the Crowne Plaza Hotel Billings shall not be categorised as a skyscraper.Winged Blades^Godric 08:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.