Talk:Cruel Sister (Pentangle album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Roots music Low‑importance

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Roots music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to roots, folk and traditional folk music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roots musicWikipedia:WikiProject Roots musicTemplate:WikiProject Roots musicRoots music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[Untitled][edit]

I'm afraid Gerry Boys is not considered to be significant. My article on him has been deleted, so I am deleting the reference to him on this page. For those who care, he considered to be significant enough to be featured on "Zoominfo" http://www.zoominfo.com/Search/PersonQuery.aspx?SearchType=simple&SearchBy=name&searchParameters=Gerry+Boys&x=25&y=11 Ogg 10:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised Boys is not considered significant...engineering Cruel Sister is good enough for me! Bluewave 16:37, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cruelsister.png[edit]

Image:Cruelsister.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Cruelsister.png[edit]

Image:Cruelsister.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:41, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Allmusic problems[edit]

Says that Allmusic criticized the track. Reading the review in more detail, you'll find that they actually like it a lot, they just don't know why they decided to record it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.254.128 (talk) 04:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Genre[edit]

Is the genre also electronic folk? Benjamin (talk) 21:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]