Talk:Crushcrushcrush

	Rock music portal This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

powerpop[edit]

ok this is not powerpop its powerful but its not powerpop, it seems that pop songs cant be powerful without being labbeled power pop —Preceding unsigned comment added by Thrice34 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

most of the album it is taken from is power pop according to sources. I think the single genres are usually taken from that as citations for individual songs are difficult. --neonwhite user page talk 03:31, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

how is crushcrushcrush pop punk (punk pop) i see pop rock and Emo is reasonable, and its like a pop song, but i just dont see the punk side of it

loveyourfaithLoveyourfaith (talk) 00:06, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about this song's genre characterization. I don't know about the other songs on this album. But there is NOTHING punk about this song's music, specifically. Compare the music sound to a real, undeniably punk band like Bad Religion or Ramones. This would be alternative rock, or maybe even emo. 76.91.80.98 (talk) 04:37, 15 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Capital letter[edit]

There seems to be some differing opinions of whether "crushcrushcrush" should be capitalized or not. I believe that, as the official website and the back of the album cover art show that it's lowercase, that's how it should be displayed. If you disagree and think it SHOULD be capitalized, let's discuss it here. For the sake of consistency, I will keep it lowercase for now. Please discuss before reverting all changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Closetoeuphoria (talk • contribs) 15:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The same situation as with Brand New Eyes, WP:MOSTM says the first letter should be capitalised and mere style changes should be ignored for the sake of clarity and consistency. I don't see why people make a big deal out of such small issues. Instead of making a big deal out of this, how about we jsut change it back and instead, spend our time improving the BNE article, eh? :) k.i.a.c (talktome - contribs) 16:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Crushcrushcrush. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080314232655/http://www.rockband.com:80/blog/entry/246426 to http://www.rockband.com/blog/entry/246426

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:07, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]