Talk:Cycas revoluta

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sago cycad[edit]

"Sago cycad" is at best a minor common name for this species, and one I have never encountered in the botanical or horticultural literature; "sago palm" is a much more familiar name. MrDarwin 15:03, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It may currently be a minor name, but it is attested (c.1000 google hits), and I consider that an encyclopedia has a duty to educate for the future, not to just perpetuate or encourage historical misconceptions - MPF 09:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Still going down that road, MPF? :o) So let's let the other shoe drop: "sago palm" gets about 33,000 hits vs. the ca. 1000 for "sago cycad". I still say it's not Wikipedia's place to impose a "correct" common name, especially when deciding who or what determines what is "correct" opens such a messy can of worms. MrDarwin 14:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It doesn't have to impose either. Post both names and state that it is not a true palm or even a flowering plant. --Kalmia 06:52, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Poison[edit]

I believe this information should be added to the article:

Thanks (unsigned anonymous ip user) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.79.147.192 (talk) 18:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

native to Japan?[edit]

what's the stuff they eat in papua new guinea then? --86.149.68.120 17:28, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Taxonomy[edit]

This is not a flowering plant. It is a gymnosperm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Reallyoldplants (talkcontribs) 05:00, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

production of sago?[edit]

This line should be removed or have a reference, hole article states this is a very toxic plant.

It is one of several species used for the production of sago, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.236.114.204 (talk) 15:32, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cycas revoluta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:49, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cycas revoluta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]