Talk:Cycling Without Age

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because the page has been made in good faith, but by a novice user who has indeed lifted text directly from the source. I will have a go at reworking the article summary / stub with original text --RadishSlice _talk 19:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I tried, but my changes were reverted by User:Praxidicae. Not clear what I've done wrong. -RadishSlice _talk 21:03, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Praxidicae: what has happened - did I not contest the speedy deletion correctly? Where has my work gone, and why was it reverted? - RadishSlice _talk 01:15, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The new content I wrote for the stub page was less than 2.5% on the Copyvio tool (matching on names and job titles) - RadishSlice _talk 01:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This section should be obsolete since I rewrote the whole article... --Wribln (talk) 11:52, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

CWA global chapter.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:23, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]