Talk:Cyprien Ntaryamira/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MatEditzWiki (talk · contribs) 08:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment First check in Immediate failures
- It is not a long way from meeting any one of the six good article criteria
- It does not contain copyright violations
- It does not have cleanup banners that are unquestionably still valid. These include cleanup, POV, unreferenced or large numbers of citation needed, clarify, or similar tags.
- It is stable and does not have edit warring on the page

MatEditzWiki (talk) 08:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment First criteria (well written) check:
- a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; check
- b. it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  - lead section: check
  - layout: check
  - words to watch: check
  - fiction: guideline check not needed
  - list incorporation: guideline check not needed

MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:06, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Second criteria (verifiable) check:
- a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; check
- b. all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; check
- c. it contains no original research; check
- d. it contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism. check

MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Third criteria (broad in its coverage) check:
- a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic; check
- b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail. check

MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Fourth criteria check:
- a. it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. check
- b. it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. check
- c. illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: check
  - ca. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; check
  - cb. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. check

Passed. MatEditzWiki (talk) 09:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]