Talk:Dương Thu Hương

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Calling Duong Thu Huong "the most popular writer in Vietnam" is not an objective assessment.


Everything from "In her story “The Story of an Actress,” ..." to the reference section is Not NPOV. LeeNapier 16:52, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The claim "The center of Vietnamese literature is in southern California" is also not an objective assessment.

Agree - this is a rather fatuous statement that violates NPOV. I can imagine Hương rolling her eyes at the idea of Orange County being the equivalent of Iona Abbey for Vietnamese literature. 202.161.7.69 12:00, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism[edit]

The section "Criticism" is biased

"Dương has been outspoken about many issues in Vietnam. However, a few believe that the vituperative and combative tone of her writings is more personal than intellectual. Dương believes that the quest of any intellectual in Vietnam is to attack the current regime and she therefore condemns all neutral voices. She believes that if a writer does not attack the government unequivocally, he cannot count as an intellectual, "no matter how many liters of oil he spends on reading each month." This extreme point of view is deemed by these critics as unhelpful, especially when Dương issues personal attacks on even forward thinking intellectuals whose voice she deems not completely dissenting. This, together with her often irreverent and personal attacks on figures of Vietnamese history who are well respected by the people such as Ho Chi Minh, lead many to believe that Dương writes more for a foreign audience than for Vietnamese. These critics argue that her intellectual motive is therefore questionable."

As it lacks references it violates NPOV and should be removed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ToDo Road (talkcontribs) 08:59, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Hopefully it can be referenced, balanced and replaced at some point. -- Khazar (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It was removed at some point. Please use {{POV-section}} for sections or {{POV-statement}} for sentences, then detail issues here. This will help address them in a timely manner. - RoyBoy 23:53, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:DTH2b.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:DTH2b.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:DTH2b.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:59, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dương Thu Hương. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]