Talk:DCI-P3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Incorrect Stated Whitepoint[edit]

DCI-P3 whitepoint stated as being D65 is incorrect: it is a specific whitepoint closer to 6300K and based on a Xenon Arc Lamp with xy chromaticity coordinates as follow: (0.314, 0.351)

References

KelSolaar (talk) 09:26, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DCI-P3 can use more than one white point and the one that will be used for consumer video will be DCI-P3 D65. --GrandDrake (talk) 18:56, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That did not age well. 2A00:1370:812D:2909:E983:ADF0:3065:12E3 (talk) 05:57, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect references to "color space" in picture box caption[edit]

The caption to the picture box at the top of the article repeatedely refers to "color space" even though the image is of a chromaticity diagram. Chromaticity diagrams most certainly do not depict color spaces, nor are chromaticities color spaces themselves, though they can (and frequently are) used to provide a portion of the definition of the primaries and white point in RGB color spaces. I have accordingly edited the text to be more factually accurate. Lovibond (talk) 17:23, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How does it compare to ARGB?[edit]

Is DCI-P3 a subset of Adobe RGB?--146.52.211.5 (talk) 10:54, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neither the P3 gamut nor the Adobe RGB gamut is fully contained within the other. --2620:0:1000:2110:5C1B:875C:DC97:EF6C (talk) 22:01, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on DCI-P3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:01, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

iPad Pro 10.5” supports it too[edit]

Omission. Rizzuhjj (talk) 02:47, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We need 3D gamut image[edit]

As in here http://static.astramael.com/1/colorsync-3dplot.mp4 Valery Zapolodov (talk) 02:42, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Valery Zapolodov, File:SRGB_gamut_within_CIELAB_color_space_mesh.webm (with source code) from SharkD might be a good place to start. I think it's something about cspace_other somewhere that you need to change... Artoria2e5 🌉 08:11, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can we describe P3 coverage as Calman and rtings do it?[edit]

I.e. from here https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/c9-oled now if you compare with this https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/lg/g1-oled ? Valery Zapolodov (talk) 02:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know what actually happened to power issue in[edit]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYWDsJGVYWY Valery Zapolodov (talk) 05:31, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup tags[edit]

This article's clean up tags had overly detailed explanations, added by User:A Shortfall Of Gravitas. I am moving the explanations here to remove clutter from the actual article.

Copy edit tag[edit]

  • Awkward phrasing; it's like a mixture between Yoda and auto-translate throughout. Sentences like "In September 2014, introduced during a fair trade Photokina in Germany the CG-318 - the first professional 4K monitor with supporting of P3 color space." are readable but not proper English. Others are much worse, too much for me to being doing having wanting tackle in past future now moment.

Update tag[edit]

  • Talks about DCI-P3 possibly being used in the future for home cinema (not P3-D65, and using an article as a reference that shows that godawfully jpeg-artifacted "is this dress blue or gold" meme from years back as an example of something it isn't, which should immediately discredit it)... P3 D65 in BT.2020 primaries are used on a huge % of UHD BluRays, it's practically a requirement for an HDR10 display.

Overly detailled tag[edit]

  • There are far too many products to make listing those that claim support here either relevant or possible to be done in any kind of complete manner (it's missing at least 4 displays / devices I own that cover the whole colorspace and I wasn't even buying them because they were supposed to support it, they just happen to), the whole list should be removed.

Tags written by User:A Shortfall Of Gravitas, moved by — Mcguy15 (talk, contribs)

21:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi @A Shortfall Of Gravitas: No doubt this article was a hot mess, Wiki Color articles seem to be the victim of some sort of russian discord campaign, LOL! I did one fairly complete revision, but I left the issues template at the top of the article as there are probably a few more bits to fix, such as possibly reducing jargon, but I need fresh eyes to be objective. Myndex (talk) 11:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Do you see russian collusion in the room right now? Article is a hot mess now after you ruined it. 2A00:1370:8184:164:49D1:BA8C:B200:C381 (talk) 03:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war with Russia[edit]

The entirety of the color space related pages have been under siege by some number of russians, clearly english is not their first language, and they do place their colloquial syntax here in the American english related pages, and it is incorrect. What can we do about this problem? Most recently I corrected the formatting of DCI-P3, and again, one of them reverted that edit.

They mostly use anonymous IP addresses. Do we need to protect these pages?Myndex (talk) 06:59, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is no politics section, go there libtard. 2A00:1370:8184:164:7D53:F8E0:4BCD:B758 (talk) 22:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How about you stay on Russian Wikipedia and leave the English Wikipedia to native English speakers, and importantly, stop vandalizing these pages with your nonsense. Myndex (talk) 02:43, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Some weird turf war (cold war? ice turf?) mentality going on here. Some folks spoke choppy English (e.g. "early production" does not sound like it's about displays capable of a useful fraction of P3) for sure, but to assume bad faith is a bit too far.

  • The device spaghetti is not caused by some Russian dude. It was started by User:61.238.78.220, which is a... Hong Kong IP. Well, back then it was new and useful.
  • A number of intervening edits added more devices. You can see that people took the list seriously even on this talk page: there's people asking why a certain iPad model wasn't listed.
  • "Fair trade Photokina" is due to a Japanese guy. Most of the account's edits were helpful, or at least trying to be. This person's draft page shows the same "yoda phrasing" or whatever you call it, but that's just what happens with language barriers. (Japanese–English machine translation is also terrible before DeepL. With non-native speakers you sometimes genuinely can't tell if they are using an outdated machine translation program or actually cobbling words together from a dictionary using their limited understanding of the syntax.)
  • The one guy with a Russian name, Valery Zapolodov, is actually quite good at English!
  • 2A00 is a Russian IP, but their edits are mostly positive in terms of phrasing. What you did with the P3-D60 part of the table is very wrong.

--Artoria2e5 🌉 08:32, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:DCI-P3&oldid=1212159276"