Talk:DJ Hero/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- I only came across one prose error, a simple mistake in the reception section: "The omission of a practice mode we noted by Dameon Hatfield of IGN". Other than that, fine.
- B. MoS compliance:
- There's a few instances of "Guitar Hero" not be italicised, and a few bits of overlinking with artists such as "DJ Shadow", "DJ AM" and "Daft Punk" in the development and soundtrack sections.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- Only thing that concerns me here is the use of jargon like "turntablism". I know there's a link to an article, but it might be helpful to provide a very quickfire explanation to the term upon its first use, so readers still have an idea what the term means without clicking the link.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- There's just a small number minor niggling issues to deal with, otherwise the article is very well put together and is easily a GA.
- Pass or Fail: