Talk:Daljit Ami

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 August 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Punjab Low‑importance

	Punjab portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punjab, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Punjab on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PunjabWikipedia:WikiProject PunjabTemplate:WikiProject PunjabPunjab-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Punjab Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as Low-importance).

File:Daljit Ami.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Daljit Ami.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Daljit Ami.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 10:35, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... The article is currently at AFd and issues are being corrected. What portions does the AFD nominator claim are copyvio? Or is this just a back door to his deletion nomination? The tagger is apparently unaware that sources outside Wikipedia often use us as a source. He claims information in tutorgigpedia is a copyvio, when actually looking would show THEY copied from us. Further, yatedo.fr is a malware site in French and nyanglish.com's did a check of the phrase "known for his activism" showing it also taking from Wikipedia, not the other way round. THAT ain't copyvio Pen\gin. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:20, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

CSD removed[edit]

I've removed the invalid CSD tag.

These evidence links are copies of Wikipedia:
1. tutorgigpedia.com is a confirmed Wikipedia mirror listed at Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks/Stu#TutorGig
2. www.yatedo.fr directly attributes Wikipedia as the source: http://www.yatedo.fr/p/Daljit+Ami/famous/121c458dfb176df79b45e975f2f08125 (Click on "En savoir plus")
3. nyanglish.com is a language learning site which probably aggregates examples of the given expression from other web pages
I'm not sure about the flim summaries on www.sikharts.com and allevents.in, but the portions in question can be removed.

Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 08:35, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the film summaries. Zhaofeng Li [talk... contribs...] 08:38, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Nothing will be returned unless properly attributed. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 08:49, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Daljit Ami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]