Talk:Damart

This page was proposed for deletion by Ale jrb (talk · contribs) on 6 October 2008 with the comment:
Non-notable company - 1 article is not significant coverage (see WP:N)
It was contested by Fatbobsufc (talk · contribs) on 2008-10-08

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Deletion proposal[edit]

Keep: Well known high street company in Great Britain and Ireland for more than 30 years. ww2censor (talk) 05:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Damartex or Damart?[edit]

The term "Damartex" is suddenly introduced with no warning - is it the same thing, something else, or what? The way it reads at the moment tempts me just to change it to "Damart" but I hope there's more to it than that! :) DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 14:55, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Structure - attempt to update[edit]

The present structure seems a little wrong, with too many things of non-equivalent value at the same level. I am planning to have a little go at something I hope works better - what do you think? Best wishes, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 14:56, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Motorcyclists[edit]

When Ah were young (eeee) Damart was the thermals de choix for the discerning biker - this is how I know about them! Is the Damart-bikes connection strong enough to be significant (as in, worth a mention), and is it likely that it is documented somewhere? Just a thought. Cheers, DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered (talk) 15:02, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Company ownership[edit]

I heard a rumour going around back in 1992 that this company was actually taken over and owned by a company called 'Kmart'. Wondering if this is true? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.12.29.193 (talk) 15:58, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy[edit]

Despite the 2005 outrage, this disgusting company continues to use pressure selling techniques with its elderly customers, especially using bogus 'lottery wins' and marking mailshots to indicate they they are somehow official documents or accounts related. I don't have a ref but my 81 year old mother has personal experience of this. --Ef80 (talk) 09:56, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, unfortunately that is WP:OR lacking WP:RS, unless you can find some. ww2censor (talk) 14:35, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]