Talk:Dampiera purpurea

A fact from Dampiera purpurea appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 29 November 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that skippers, lycaenids and honeybees visit the flowers of Dampiera purpurea?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2011/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Dampiera purpurea.

Wikipedia

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Queensland / Victoria / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Dampiera purpurea is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Nice when you read something in an authoritative source that gells with personal experience - at my old house (on sandstone soil on top of a ridge), this did pretty poorly, while I've got one booming away on a more clay-based soil at my new house....and Elliot and Jones wrote something taht corresponds... :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]