Talk:Dan Donegan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tags[edit]

Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information

The complete list of instruments used by the musician is not necessarily good for the article... I think that it should be taken off the article. Also, some of the information is useless. We don't need to know about the history of Dan Donegan's hair! Plus there are no sources. If you fix those problems, take off the tags, but keep them until the problems are there. Zouavman Le Zouave (Talk to me!O)))) 16:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment over article[edit]

I agree, if someone can expand Mr. Donegan's history/background it will be of immense value to the article itself. I do not know a single thing about Dan's background, so whoever put in the "long hair" nugget must have thought it appropriate or it might have been something of importance to Dan himself (as apparently elaborated on the DVD - if someone can verify this, it'll be appreciated).

As for the complete list of what Dan is using at the moment, I think it is approriate as well. Especially the parts concerning his amplifiers and his Maya custom guitars. Dan is a proud user of Randall products and has his own Randall signature pre-amp module. However, I do believe that the specific information on the guitar itself (the features in particular) are unneccesary and detract value from the article. I will thus remove this information and if anyone is unhappy about it: the original version can be restored from the Page History link.

155.232.128.10 14:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i know sum stuff[edit]

ok i have the speisil edision of ten thousand fists and it states what equipment dan endorses; i could put that in.GuyDoe 01:49, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]



Wow[edit]

This entire article reads like a rough draft written in crayon.

Solos does not need an apostrophe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.144.68 (talk) 08:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Metallica?[edit]

It says accociated acts Disturbed and Metallica. Now Disturbed... Well no shit really, but how metallica? the page has nothing there on him ever being a part of Metallica (and im a big fan of both Disturbed and Metallica, yet iv never heard of this) please explain.


I LOVE DAN DONEGAN! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.188.129.242 (talk) 22:24, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Guitar[edit]

I have seen some tabliture for disturbed, how many frets are on his guitars? mine have 22, but he seems to have 24+.Firio (talk) 17:03, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Middle name[edit]

He just said on his Twitter page that the J in his name stands for Joseph. I don't know where this "James" came in.

http://twitter.com/#!/DanJDonegan/status/154890291076284417

If you're curious, David Draiman himself has confirmed that that really is his official Twitter.WickedKnightAlbel (talk) 12:44, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dan Donegan/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Whoever wrote this last part should be summarily shot and killed in a firing squad :

"Dand Donegan used many guitars and is most popular for using his Maya series. Dan first started out using a Gibson Les Pual, yes the all famous les paul which is a lot of f'ing money. He used a les paul and changed the color throughout their albums The Sickness and Belive. When their third album, Ten Thousand Fists was published, Donegan hooked up with Washburn (not as pop as Gibson) and they helped him create the Maya series named after his two-year old daughter, Maya. There are 5 or six (i might be wrong) Maya series guitars. The first was the DD60, then DD70, DD75, DD80, DD85, DD90. Note: only losers buy Gibson les pauls. They're are f'ing waste of money. Epiphone les pauls are just as good except cheaper. So f all of you Gibson fans."


Let's be clear on this :

If you cannot respect the fact that Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral and unbiased and serves only to inform and not to judge or provide opinions, YOU DO NOT DESERVE TO BENEFIT FROM THE KNOWLEDGE ON WIKIPEDIA AT ALL.

Whoever the hell you are, YOU'VE BEEN WARNED.

Last edited at 09:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 12:44, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Donegan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:06, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dan Donegan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:13, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dan Donegan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:20, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]