Talk:Dan Gilroy/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 19:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
I'll take a look and make straightforward copyedits as I go (please revert if I accidentally change the meaning!) and jot notes below Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:54, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
- Lead is a bit slim
- What do you suggest I add? I think it's reasonably long for an article that has nearly 6k prose size
Try to minimise (if possible) the number of paragraphs that start with "Gilroy..."
- Done
Dan Gilroy recalled growing up "in a house where our father was a working writer and working at home. We got to see him write, and that demystified the process of becoming a writer."- rewrite and paraphrase without quoting.
- Done
- The Career section is a bit listy. It would greatly benefit from any other information or fleshing out of his involvement with each or any movie. Any extra sourceable material here would be great.
- as the previous cut had lay much emphasis on the characters - grammar? "lain"?
- Hi Casliber, can I get a status update on the review? Did you want me to expand it further with regard to the remaining issues? Slightlymad 05:02, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
NB: Earwigs is ok Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:21, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
1. Well written?:
- Prose quality:
- Manual of Style compliance:
2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
3. Broad in coverage?:
- Major aspects: (in an ideal world, there'd be some more background on some earlier movies but then, are we surprised that Freejack has been well and truly forgotten about by everybody?
- Focused:
4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):
6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall: