Talk:Daniel Ek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Evertigo?[edit]

Can't find anything about it on google. Is this a mis-hearing of Advertigo? Crasshopper (talk) 22:48, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:23, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Surname[edit]

Did his family's surname used to be something else before it was Ek? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:33, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the Swedish surname Ek is derived from the Swedish word for "oak." 173.88.246.138 (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It appear to have been Ek all the time. Per W (talk) 16:49, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Foaming detected[edit]

The aroma of sentences such as "Ek realized that money was meaningless without a project he was passionate about" betray the promotional tone of the text. The hammer will be coming down soon unless objections are raised. -The Gnome (talk) 19:12, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Covid vaccine disinformation controversy[edit]

That Neil Young referenced Daniel Ek is not noteworthy to Ek's page. Article referenced to support Rogan's "misinformation" doesn't actually support the claim. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.219.158.52 (talk) 18:05, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 1 February 2022[edit]

Remove the "Net Worth" section: it is not really possible for the media to determine someone's net worth, you can only end up with bad and vague guesstimates. As indicated by the existing "original research" tag, what's written there currently is sloppy original research based on Spotify's stock valuation, not even a proper guess at his net worth. Endwise (talk) 03:17, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree. It is removed. FalconK (talk) 04:46, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]