Talk:Daniel Jolliffe

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Sources exist on Newspapers.com[edit]

Numerous news sources exist on Newspapers.com that could be added to the article. [1]. Netherzone (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Spelling[edit]

@Curiocurio: @John of Reading: So you are saying that the Gage Dictionary is at odds with this piece from the Canadian Government? Please share the entry within the mentioned Dictionary. Neils51 (talk) 01:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The dictionary says humourless or humorless, both are acceptable. I would say this whole discussion is humourless. Curiocurio (talk) 14:08, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And in what way does the dictionary disagree with the CA government's spelling of humorously? Neils51 (talk) 02:41, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curiocurio:, looking forward to your response. Neils51 (talk) 00:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I've already said, both humourless (which is the first option in the dictionary) and humorless are acceptable spellings for Canadians. Curiocurio (talk) 01:45, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Curiocurio:, please focus on the spelling that you reverted which is of humorously. Neils51 (talk) 10:24, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]