Talk:Dannemora (village), New York

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

New York (state) High‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Demographics[edit]

So what is this about the population? For every 100 females there are 500 some odd males? That is crazy. Are they counting the prison population in the cited census stats or what? I mean, I grew up there and I seem to remember things differently. -- (This article was signed by User:Saracanite on 04:25, 29 April 2006)

The US Census considers the prison population to be counted as residents, which is why the population for males are so high. This is also why Dannemora is the second largest community in the Adirondack Park. --Riley 02:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup[edit]

The last section of the article needs to be either deleted, or moved and rewritten. --Riley 02:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I say delete all but leave the 'per capita' part.--Vircabutar 08:27, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Dannemora (village), New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]