Talk:Danny Kushlick

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed merger[edit]

  1. This article overlaps considerably with the proposed target.
  2. There is a longstanding consenus that we do not retain article on losing politicians in this encyclopaedia.
S a g a C i t y (talk) 11:36, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with merge. I don't think independent articles for losing candidates is an appropriate precedent to set. Espresso Addict (talk) 09:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm happy with the merger. The subject clearly has sufficient sources to verify notability and, therefore, does not qualify for deletion (is that's what is meant by "we do not retain"?). However, as the "party" has an article, WP:POLITICIAN suggests a merge to The People's Manifesto would be best. matt (talk) 14:47, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree with the merger as the subject is primarily an independent Journalist [1] – Standing as the People's Manifesto candidate in the 2010 general election was a relatively small matter by comparison. Perhaps instead, the article should be moved into the Category:English_journalists Greg (talk) 13:49, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  1. ^ http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/dannykushlick

Hi, I am Danny Kushlick. I am not primarily a journalist, I'm a campaigner for drug law reform. Standing for the People's Manifesto was indeed a very short lived affair and, despite the fact that I have written a lot for the press and taken part in numerous broadcasts, I am not a journalist. I would prefer, if my entry could remain as an individual, but if any merging does take place, it should be with the Wiki entry for Transform Drug Policy Foundation, not the People's Manifesto. Just my point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.188.208.251 (talk) 09:43, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Altered target[edit]

Based on the above I have recast the merge propsal. However I am now quite neutral on this matter and would be happy if we were to retain Mr Kushlick's entry but alter its emphasis to describe him as an activist rather than a politician. S a g a C i t y (talk) 12:25, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I support this merge. I don't think this person is really notable by our standards in his own right. Robofish (talk) 00:55, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Robofish. Valetude (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Danny Kushlick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Danny Kushlick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Danny_Kushlick&oldid=1201078387"