Talk:David Dingwall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Just a note that I removed the concluding sentence from the article that accused Dingwall of lying during his testimony as I feel it's NPOV. He says he quit, as do several others, and a judge concluded he was forced out. Leaving aside whether both might be true, I don't believe it's for this article to conclude whether one person or another lied. --Otter Escaping North 12:59, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, definatly...this article was for some time the target of partisan trolls...I tried to clean it up, but wouldn't be surprised if some were left in. Good work.Habsfan|t 14:29, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It says in the article: "he correctly remarked 'I'm entitled to my entitlements.'" Someone needs to explain why the word "correctly" is in there. It should not be, as that is presenting an opinion, thus the statement is not neutral.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on David Dingwall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]