Talk:Deaconsbank

can i just ask why this article has been selected for speedy deletion i just wanted to start an article for the housing estate i was brought up in and my family continues to live in. All the facts i have put up i believe to be correct.

Brydo16 00:45, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

It was probably brought up for speedy deletion because it appears to be original research. If you cite some sources, there's a chance that the admins won't delete it, but it would also help if you revamp the article to look more encyclopedic. Useight 05:52, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

I, the admin closing speedy deletions, have put a "proposed deletion" tag. Try to get the article up to standards soon, and you can remove the tag after that. Otherwise, it will be deleted in five days.--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 13:04, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

hey thanks to Useight and Kunfu Adam ive brought this page up to standard and added refrences I hope this has prevented the article from being deleted and allow it to grow. again thank you guys.Brydo16 14:14, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Deaconsbank. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130707023808/http://www.ros.gov.uk:80/public/publications/leaflets.html to http://www.ros.gov.uk/public/publications/leaflets.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:48, 9 December 2016 (UTC)