Talk:Dedicated to Chaos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Genre[edit]

Okay, let's get this over with. Clearly, there's going to be genre warring on this article, like most music-related articles recently. So it would seem like a good idea at this point to gather consensus on what the stated genre should be, to prevent more fighting in the future. I suggest we just leave it at "Rock." Remember, the infobox isn't supposed to list more than a couple of genres that summarize the entire album, and preferably it should list ones that are properly sourced as well. Does anyone have any thoughts on the subject? And until we get consensus, can we please refrain from adding anything else? Remember, the infobox genre is not a big deal. In fact, it shouldn't be as much of an issue as it already is. Thanks. Friginator (talk) 16:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have any suggestions for the genre assigning, but I think your changing it to simply "Rock" is a good call. I'm glad that there hasn't been more genre feuding [yet], but I do agree that it is a very small matter that way too many people take out of proportion. I think genre warring is a very stupid activity that is pursued by close-minded fools who have their priorities in the wrong place. I won't go on a rant here, but if consensus is reached and reliable sources are supplied, then I'll be cool with whatever genre line-up is put in the infobox. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 18:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Just for the record, what people think it should be doesn't matter, it's reliable references of third party sources stating what it is that should be used. Canterbury Tail talk 22:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That is true. Genre warring can and does violate multiple Wikipedia guidelines, and the perps think that their opinions on genre assignment are very important, when that is not the case. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 22:38, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, but the hard part is finding a reliable source. Allmusic simply lists the album as "Pop/Rock" and there aren't many other sites usually used for this sort of thing. People frequently cite reviews, though I would hardly call someone's personal opinion in a review a reliable source. Friginator (talk) 23:54, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really necessary?[edit]

Almost half the article consists of the former producer whining about how poorly treated he was. Seems to unbalance the whole article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.193.128.193 (talk) 14:37, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think "half the article" is a bit of an exageration, though it is a cited point and while (I personally) don't think it needs removing, you're certainly welcome to add to the article to give it a more balanced tone/another point of view. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dedicated to Chaos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dedicated to Chaos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:39, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dedicated_to_Chaos&oldid=1201418346"