Talk:Delete (SQL)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Databases (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Databases, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.DatabasesWikipedia:WikiProject DatabasesTemplate:WikiProject DatabasesDatabases articles

Difference[edit]

difference between truncate ane delete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 202.63.114.20 (talk • contribs) .

Truncate is not a SQL statement (just a proprietary extension of some DBMS) --Stolze 14:33, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

Recommend merging UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE, MERGE and SELECT statements into DML article and redirecting these statements there. Comments? SqlPac 05:19, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These articles appear to be specific to SQL, not DML generally. 64.236.208.25 14:36, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

POLICY DEBATE: Use of source code and other examples in articles[edit]

Someone started a policy debate concerning the use of source code in articles, that seems to directly impact this (and possibly other Database articles). See below for details:

I have opened a debate on the use of source code and other examples in Wikipedia articles. It seems that many pieces of example source code etc. currently in Wikipedia violate Wikipedia policy, so we need to either clarify or change the situation. Depending on the result of the discussion, this may result in a number of source code examples being summarily removed from computing articles!

Please reply there, not here, if you wish to contribute.—greenrd 10:50, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.SqlPac 15:08, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple-table syntax[edit]

Should Multiple-table syntax be included or it is not SQL standard? http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/delete.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.235.227.10 (talk) 16:39, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to be a standard by adoption at least, I was disappointed not to find an example like:

delete [alias]

 from [table] [alias]
   inner join [table] [alias] on [table].[field] = [table].[field]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.51.190.48 (talk) 12:37, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 April 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page as proposed at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 05:25, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (SQL) → DELETE (SQL) – this is the way the clause is usually written, even though the programming language is case insensitive 209.52.88.34 (talk) 21:28, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per WP:ALLCAPS_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:43, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:ALLCAPS. And you don't have to point out the irony of using that manual of style guide... Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above - What does caps achieve that lowercase doesn't ? ... Oppose. –Davey2010^Talk 22:46, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.