Talk:Deroceras

Gastropods Mid‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

August 2013[edit]

I have partialy reverted the simplifications made by Tortie tude concerning the subgeneric classification. I think it worthwhile to mention explicitly Wiktor's name here (he is probably the most important slug taxonomist of recent times), to highlight that he has changed his opinion since earlier work, and to explain his reasoning. The reason he gave for simplifying the classification was not that it was too complicated but that his earlier classification implied too many reversals and convergences (i.e. tending to imply that it was inconsistent with the phylogeny). The extra detail is certainly helpful to biologists, and I don't think it is too demanding for other users. Jmchutchinson (talk) 21:11, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]