Talk:Descendant (2003 film)

Requested move 27 December 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. (non-admin closure) sami ^talk 22:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In conjunction with the concurrent RM The Descendants → The Descendants (2011 film) at Talk:The Descendants#Requested move 26 December 2017, we may consider that since these are sole films bearing such very specific titles, the years would not be needed. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 20:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose all completely anti-user. This will make life more difficult for the 15% of people who (according to OED) spell "descendants" as "descendents". It's not our job to beat readers with spelling variants. In ictu oculi (talk) 21:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support first and third per nom. The titles disambiguate themselves. The second one should not be here; Descendants (2015 film) exists. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 21:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. In view of the fact pointed out above by Taylor Trescott, the middle nomination, Descendants (2008 film) → Descendants (film), is withdrawn. It may be also noted that another related concurrent nomination, Descendents → Descendents (band), is at Talk:Descendents#Requested move 26 December 2017. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 22:16, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly OPPOSE #2, weak support #1 and #3. Glad you got rid of #2, as Descendants (2015 film) still exists. I agree with User:Taylor Trescott and kinda with the nom. However, the band Descendents should probably move to → Descendents (band). Paintspot Infez (talk) 21:10, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Per IIO, a little bit of extra clarity in topic identification is often a good thing, and the average person doesn't consider a minor spelling variation to be an indication that a different topic is being discussed. —BarrelProof (talk) 00:49, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose all Renaming these articles would be trolly at best. There is nothing beneficial whatsoever from renaming them._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 06:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Better graphic[edit]

If the year of this film is removed from title it will become more important to have a good graphic to help identification - not clear what the current jpg is (a variant DVD cover?), suggest replace with the movie poster. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:34, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]