Talk:Destroy Rebuild Until God Shows

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 2010[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved to D.R.U.G.S., per discussion below. - GTBacchus(talk) 16:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]



Drugs (band)DRUGS — This is an abbreviation; I mean, shortened for United States of America is USA, not Usa; thus shortened for Destroy Rebuild Until God Shows is DRUGS, not Drugs. And Manual of Style says nothing exact about that. R8R Gtrs (talk) 09:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • The meaning of the name doesn't appear to be relevant, unless it is also the official name, and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (trademarks) suggests that it probably depends on pronunciation of the name. It looks like the band is usually referred to as "D.R.U.G.S.", and that would be equally valid (see options for disambiguation at Wikipedia:Disambiguation#Naming the specific topic articles). Peter E. James (talk) 11:31, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • How many people know, or realize, that it is an acronym, and how many merely treat the name as meaning that the band named themselves after drugs? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 13:21, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think, they mostly think those both; it is clear words play.--R8R Gtrs (talk) 14:04, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Currently DRUGS redirects to Drug (disambiguation). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 00:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose use D.R.U.G.S. instead, that actually redirects here, and uses standard punctuation. On the disambiguation page, there is another band with the name "DRUGS" already. 65.93.12.43 (talk) 04:52, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose to your oppose since points are just stylification. And that band has no Wikipage (but even if it would, that'd be called DRUGS (French band) (if French, that's not in name). And lots of words in brackets are actually OK, nothing scary. --R8R Gtrs (talk) 16:05, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • "D.R.U.G.S." is an equally valid (and less ambiguous) title, and is used by as many (probably more) sources, including the band's page on Myspace - although "DRUGS" would also be acceptable. The current title is probably wrong - it looks like it is only used in Wikipedia and not in any news or official sites. Peter E. James (talk) 16:39, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • periods are grammatically correct 64.229.101.17 (talk) 05:34, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • MOS:TM: "editors should choose among styles already in use (not invent new ones)" - is the band ever referred to as "Drugs"? Peter E. James (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • How is the band's name normally read? — AjaxSmack 22:45, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Alt Press, Sputnik, Artist Direct, MySpace and Absolute Punk all use D.R.U.G.S as the name, many of which are used as sources for similar music. Surely this should be the name? Grey Matter (talk) 01:59, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Looks like D.R.U.G.S. is how the band is generally referred to by such sources as exist, so I see no reason not to follow. --Kotniski (talk) 11:38, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • The band appears to be making a move to change the official stylization to spelling it out as Destroy Rebuild Until God Shows. It appears this way on their Facebook and official site (Tumblr). It has been abbreviated to D.R.U.G.S. in the past, and in some places, it is still stylized as the acronym. Never was the name intended to be "Drugs" or spelled in such manner, as D.R.U.G.S. is an acronym for the band's name. Either way, I agree to moving the wiki to either "D.R.U.G.S." or "Destroy Rebuild Until God Shows", as "Drugs" is irrelevant. Marcodarco1 (talk) 02:41, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Associated acts[edit]

Why is the Sounds of Animals Fighting listed?--Omair00 (talk) 22:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Owens was a member for one album released. --KЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 02:31, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 2011[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:33, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]



D.R.U.G.S.Destroy Rebuild Until God ShowsIt would seem like their name may not be the acronym after all. However, it looks like the album's name is still the acronym. --KЯĀŽΨÇÉV13 22:25, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support - The band initially went under the name D.R.U.G.S. but recent media coverage has used the full name; I think they are shifting on the fly. Chubbles (talk) 19:16, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Progressive Hardcore (Genre discussion)[edit]

Hi i think progressive hardcore should be up there since they are Hardcore Punk and Progressive Rock Ericdeaththe2nd (talk )

Seeming progressive hardcore is a sub genre of hardcore punk and progressive rock, listing "progressive hardcore'", of course it will be redundant. — ıʇɐʞǝɐdʌɐиƭɐqǝoɟʎouɹqoɐʇ [] 22:05, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, the other genres should stay up though Ericdeaththe2nd (talk )

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Destroy Rebuild Until God Shows. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Destroy Rebuild Until God Shows. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:19, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Timeline Necessary?[edit]

The band member history of this very short-lived band is easy to follow without a timeline. Could someone explain what the timeline contributes?--Wizenthorne (talk) 20:06, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]