Talk:Diana Sailplanes Diana

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Statement about maximum wing loading appears to no longer be accurate. The Schleicher datasheet lists a wing loading of up to 59.8 for the 15m ASG29.

Petebutt: ASG29 certainly should be cross-referenced here, it is a great machine. But about the wing loading:

  1. can you give the reference? Brief search of http://www.alexander-schleicher.de gives 33-57kg/m2 wing loading, but perhaps for 18m configuration and/or without engine...
  2. I could not find any "inacurate" statement on Diana 2 wrt wing loading. It says "very large range", not "record maximal". Can you point to the phrase which is inacurate? Somewhere (I could not find on Wikipedia) people talk about record RANGE of wing loading (Diana 2 can change by more than 100%), this still seems valid... Szafranpl (talk) 08:14, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Diana Sailplanes Diana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]