Talk:Dianne Wilkerson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

not entitled to a preliminary hearing[edit]

I removed the reference to a preliminary hearing. The government arrested Sen. Wilkerson on a criminal complaint, but since the grand jury then indicted her, she's not entitled to a preliminary hearing. Tfolkman (talk) 19:16, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Booted from State House after removing papers[edit]

I removed the paragraph because the referenced article is very unclear.

http://news.bostonherald.com/news/politics/view/2008_11_25_Senate_prez_boots_Dianne_Wilkerson_from_State_House_after_pop-in

It states that two large bins of papers were removed from the State House. By whom? Were they returned?

Her lawyer Stern stated: “She hasn’t thrown out anything that the FBI won’t look through,” Is it just me, or is that nonsense?

The paragraph I removed stated that she was escorted off the premises and that the papers were recovered. I don't see that in the reference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Frodesiak (talk • contribs) 20:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

disgraced[edit]

Considering the video evidence, this is viable. Wikipedia does not adhere to "Innocent until proven guilty". She has been disgraced in the public and media eye, and this site should mirror the current zeitgeist of the Boston area. Dough007 (talk) 03:34, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

With due respect, for Wikipedia to mirror the disgraced zeitgeist of the Boston area would not be neutral WP: NPOV or encyclopedic. This is not Wikitabloid. This is a just the facts, ma'am publication. Off the record, looking at the video, and her past convictions, yes, she is a criminal. That is pretty obvious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Frodesiak (talk • contribs) 05:07, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
According to [this]:
First sentence content
The article should begin with a straightforward, declarative sentence that, as briefly as possible, provides the reader who knows nothing at all about the article's subject with the answer to two questions: "What (or who) is it?" and "Why is this subject notable?".[2]
Maybe you are right in that more than just the word former is in order. Why is she notable? Because she is being charged. How about a second sentence that reads: She is currently charged with... and is awaiting a $#$^&%storm of trouble. What do you think?
Anyway, I did not undo your 'disgraced', as you may be right. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna Frodesiak (talk • contribs) 05:24, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I should not edit while drunk.Dough007 (talk) 06:14, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Photo[edit]

Can't someone dig up a photo of her? Where does one look?--Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen photos on news sites but they are not copyright free. The Flying Monkeys that control images don;t seem to recognize fair use so I have stopped trying to use images with any form of copyright. She may have a federal booking photo and that would be free. --DHeyward (talk) 04:31, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence photo[edit]

This photo here: http://media.masslive.com/breakingnews/photo/9374527-large.jpg is an evidence photo - it's clearly marked as such and it's clearly a public document because of that. We should use this photo

98.118.62.140 (talk) 03:06, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Here's a bunch more - from a reliable source: http://thephoenix.com/boston/news/70878-photos-dianne-wilkerson-nabbed/?page=7#TOPCONTENT

98.118.62.140 (talk) 03:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Member of the Massachusetts Senate from the 2nd Suffolk district[edit]

Could someone with more brains than me please fix up the infobox. Should it be a generic person box now? What should replace the 'Member of the Mass.....' etc? --Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Dianne Wilkerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Dianne Wilkerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:05, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dianne_Wilkerson&oldid=1208561094"