Talk:Discovered attack

Presumably the diagram should actually have a B on d3? -- Jake 18:01, 14 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

citation needed? seriously?[edit]

I get the feeling whoever added the "citation needed" tag to "a discovered checkmate is possible" isn't a person who's familiar with chess. It's one of those self-evident obvious truths to anyone who's played and studied the game even for a few weeks. Sure, it happens quite -rarely- in chess, but I've seen positions where a pawn move would expose the enemy's king to a bishop, rook, or queen into a checkmate. Here, I'm lazy so I'll let SineBot sign my post for me: —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.166.123 (talk) 08:20, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll go along with you. If discovered check is possible then discovered checkmate is also possible. I made the change. Bubba73 ^{(You talkin' to me?)}, 02:28, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Discovered attack. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20040805203919/http://www.markalowery.net:80/Chess/Tactics_Strategy/Tactics_Lesson2/tactics_lesson2_index.html to http://www.markalowery.net/Chess/Tactics_Strategy/Tactics_Lesson2/tactics_lesson2_index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

1.Bf3+[edit]

How is that a winning move? 2A02:17A0:561:9600:AE4C:A27C:364D:C6DE (talk) 11:43, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

White has a decisive material advantage after 1.Bf3+ K(any) 2.Rxe8. --IHTS (talk) 14:43, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]