Talk:Disneymania 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Disneymania5.jpg[edit]

Image:Disneymania5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Disneymania 4.jpg[edit]

Image:Disneymania 4.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disneymania 6[edit]

How come their is no page for this? I don't understand I know that it is not confirmed yet but I'm pretty sure that it is since I have found the cover and the tracklisting on a lot of different sites and they are all the same, so when I went to try and create the page it says it was protected. Now I did read the whole protection page, but I didn't understand it at all so I was wondering if someone could explain how we can get the page back on and running it will be greatly appreciated. Headstrong 345 (talk) 21:04, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Headstrong 345[reply]

What sources do you have? The previous DisneyMania 6 and 7 and 8 and 9 have been deleted as they were just fanish speculation about the future and the only sources were unreliable fan-sites. WP:CRYSTAL. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DisneyMania 6 and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Disneymania 6. You can also follow the procedures in Wikipedia:Deletion review or WP:RPP to allow the page to be created. --NrDg 21:31, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You know what, the Spanish counterpart of wikipedia (via dose.ca) confirmed that DisneyMania 6 will release on May 20, 2008. Selena Gomez already created her part of the album. If I were you, I would create the album page for DisneyMania 6. I'll just get the data from the Spanish article of Wikipedia. Altarep (talk) 08:05, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Any Wiki in any language is not a reliable source of information. Find a reliable source reference that is not a fan site or speculation from a blog, or a unreferenced wiki. --NrDg 15:18, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A Wiki isn't reliable but dose.ca sounds like a reliable source. Best of all, it is posted on Amazon.com and I'm sure it's reliable. Altarep (talk) 15:07, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Amazon link is http://www.amazon.com/Disneymania-6-Various-Artists/dp/B0015HZAPC showing release May 20, 2008 and label Disney Records. There is no other information in that source. dose.ca looks dubious as a reliable source. We should be seeing more info soon as Amazon is pretty reliable. Just not enough to justify anything more than a stub right now. --NrDg 15:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:DisneyMania 2 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 06:45, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Disneymania 5. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]