Talk:Distinction bias

Distinction bias was nominated as a Social sciences and society good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 10, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

[edit]

What are "joint evaluation mode and separate evaluation mode" (quoted from article.) RJFJR (talk) 03:54, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Distinction bias/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mr. Guye (talk · contribs) 22:08, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Denied: The article does not have enough content. Five sources is never enough for a GA. Also, this is because the article over quotes. with the overall tone of the article. The article contains multiple lengthy quotations from non-free sources. --Mr. Guye (talk) 22:50, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, images are mandatory for GA articles. This article lacks an image.--Mr. Guye (talk) 22:55, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! I'll work on improving the article by paraphrasing lengthy quotations, providing additional sources, and expanding. Meatsgains (talk) 03:13, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

And also look for a relevant image :) Meatsgains (talk) 03:14, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]