Talk:Divertimento No. 15 (ballet)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dance, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dance and Dance-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DanceWikipedia:WikiProject DanceTemplate:WikiProject DanceDance articles

This article is supported by WikiProject Ballet.

WikiProject Ballet To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See the Image requests page. Articles: Choo Chiat Goh, Vladimir Bourmeister, Columbia City Ballet, Michael Cook (ballet), Peter Schaufuss, Cyril Atanassoff, Post-structuralist ballet
Cleanup : Ballet Fantastique, NYCB/cast lists, re-write the whole Russian ballet article
Copyedit : Rasta Thomas, Ballet (marked as in need of immediate attention)
Disambiguation : Moscow Ballet
Expand : French ballet, Balanchine method, Cecchetti method, Original Ballet Russe, Royal Swedish Ballet, Bloch (dancewear), Turnout (ballet), Opera ballet, English ballet, Italian ballet
NPOV : Capezio
Stubs : Pas de deux, ballet tutu, Nicolai Legat, John Neumeier, Miami City Ballet, more
Unreferenced : Miami City Ballet, Oklahoma City Ballet
Wikify : Moscow Ballet (United States), Oklahoma City Ballet (in need of sections and references)
Other : Review recent changes to ballet articles.

A fact from Divertimento No. 15 (ballet) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 May 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that George Balanchine stated that he choreographed Divertimento No. 15 as he forgot his previous ballet to the same Mozart composition, but some dancers said the two works are nearly identical?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2022/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Divertimento No. 15 (ballet).

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:30, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that George Balanchine stated he choreographed Divertimento No. 15 as he forgot his previous ballet to the same Mozart score, but some dancers said the two works are near identical? Source: [1], p. 560; [2], p. 197-198
- ALT1: ~~... that George Balanchine choreographed his ballet Divertimento No. 15, to Mozart's eponymous score, for a celebration of the composer's bicentenary?~~ Source: [3], p. 560
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/AJ Glueckert

Created by Corachow (talk). Self-nominated at 00:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC).[reply]

Interesting ballet history on fine sources, offline sources accepted AGF, no copyvio obvious. I prefer the original as more unusual. I propose to run this on premiere date, 31 May. In the article, I'm not sure about the present tense in a sentence beginning with a long-ago date, nor "had been performed" for the following performances, but that may be just me. - I believe that infobox ballet would profit from Music showing the music, not the composer, but that's not this article's fault. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The music's article is in a sad state ... --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:01, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, Gerda. I'm fine with the special occasion date. The infobox is designed to show only the composer and not the score. As for the "had been performed" part, it's tricky because some of the companies had not dance it in decades, while others perform it regularly. Corachow (talk) 17:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know that the infobox is not designed to show the music but the composer, but I wish it would either say "Composer" then, or say "Music" and show music. What we have is an Easter egg. but who am I to get it improved? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:08, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]