Talk:Doctor Who: Classic Doctors, New Monsters

Doctor Who Low‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

Right now (especially with the Product Code column) this is nothing more than an advert. No indication why it is important or just a fork from an already existing list added to the fact that it may be released months from now. I am considering a Db-promo on this.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That is actually "Production Code" - it's an episode list table and it is one of the standard fields. The article is not a fork - but the start of a split of a really large and unwieldily list into actual articles with content. Plan is to improve this and other articles - but it is all a lot of work and I am only one person so far - but I have to start somewhere - right now I was aiming for minimal interruption to the original list List of Doctor Who audio plays by Big Finish while starting the split. I would thank you for your patience. If you still feel the same afterwards that will be another matter. Cheers, Dresken (talk) 12:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I personally can't see much content being added since nothing has been released yet and really right now the content is mostly a copy from the main article (definition of a fork). I would have waited until the plays were released.Peter Rehse (talk) 12:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]