Talk:Dodgers–Yankees rivalry

Baseball: Dodgers / Yankees High‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Los Angeles Dodgers (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York Yankees (assessed as High-importance).

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.
	This article is supported by Southern California task force.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Image copyright problem with Image:NLW-LAD-Logo.png[edit]

The image Image:NLW-LAD-Logo.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --00:04, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Improving this article[edit]

There's alot to be done here from a quick glance. This article is undersourced for one. But this, to me, seems the biggest problem:

A list of players who have fueled the rivalry by playing for both teams (add to this list)

   * Tommy John
   * Steve Howe
   * Steve Sax
   * Willie Randolph
   * Darryl Strawberry
   * Kenny Lofton
   * Wilson Betemit (Active)
   * Ricky Ledee
   * Gary Sheffield (Active)
   * Raul Mondesi
   * Kevin Brown
   * Todd Zeile
   * Alan Mills
   * Jeff Weaver (Active)
   * Antonio Osuna
   * David Wells
   * Angel Berroa (Active)
   * Scott Proctor
   * Doug Mientkiewicz
   * Esteban Loaiza
   * Robin Ventura
   * Jose Vizcaino
   * Rick Rhoden
   * Stan Williams
   * Chan Ho Park (Active )

Okay yes, these are the players who have played for both teams. But is this important? Angel Berroa, for instance, added "fuel to the fire"? I'll change that language for starters, but I don't know if it's important that these guys played for both teams at all. --Muboshgu (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After thinking about it, I deleted it. It's not important who played for both teams. Stengel and Torre can be incorporated in the prose. --Muboshgu (talk) 18:14, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Yankees-Red Sox rivalry and the Yankees-Mets rivalry has lists similar to this one. They included who won WS for both teams. I would suggest putting this back in as the other articles do have it too. It's good information to have and since wiki doesn't like trivia sections, it seems appropriate. I do agree it needs to be formatted better. Arnabdas (talk) 17:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dodgers–Yankees rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090906014102/http://www.nydailynews.com:80/features/thestadium/the_greatest/notsogreat-dodgers-win.html to http://www.nydailynews.com/features/thestadium/the_greatest/notsogreat-dodgers-win.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:17, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dodgers–Yankees rivalry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080925190950/http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1119946/index.htm to http://vault.sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1119946/index.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:21, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]