Talk:Dog daycare

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First comments[edit]

The page simply explains what a Dog Daycare is and what involves bringing your dog to one, I don't understand what is the difference between my page and the one for kennel wiki kennel

The issue is that most of the people do not know what a Dog Daycare is and they think it's just a kennel, and that's also because wiki keeps deleting the Daycare page.

There is no advertising on the page, it doesn't promote a service instead of another, so I see it just bigot CENSORSHIP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kd rome (talkcontribs) 19:50, 6 September 2009

Phrases like "its popularity is constantly rising", "dog owners found their self looking for a solution" and several others sound like they come from a brochure, not an encyclopedia article. Further down we have "At Doggy Daycare the dogs receive constant human companionship", "This Dog Daycare can be a 100% Cage Free or Partially Cage Free". Now, that sounds awfully specific for a supposedly general article. Favonian (talk) 20:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have declined the speedy since I think it is probably a legitimate topic, and it did not seem irredeemably spammy. I have removed a bunch of promotional language, however. Please expand and source the article asap using reliable sources such as those you can find here [1][2] and here [3]--Slp1 (talk) 21:19, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and Kd rome, please do not make accusations such as you do above. This is very much contrary to our policies of assume good faith.--Slp1 (talk) 21:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've cleaned up the article, hopefully this makes it seem less like an advertisement. If you're wondering, I found this article in Category:Articles with a promotional tone. Thanks. Netalarmtalk 04:00, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removed a link[edit]

Hello, fellow editors … I removed the external link to the subject's entry on About.com … no way can it be considered a reliable source for anything except blatant, weapons-grade vanispamcruftisement. :-) Happy Editing! — 138.88.43.201 (talk · contribs) 04:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]