Talk:Dokapon Ikari no Tetsuken

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (nom)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (nom)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (nom)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Fallout Online (start)
Donkey Kong (start)
Horizon Forbidden West (start)
Surround (video game) (start)
AirCars (start)
Laura Matsuda (start)
The Completionist (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Correct Wikiproject?[edit]

This sounds more like a video game than a board game. The first sentence is contradictory though: "Dokapon! Ikari no Tetsuken is a role playing board game made for the PlayStation."

the preceding comment came from Slimy asparagus —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:22, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I also left a comment here on the Video games wikiproject talk page. Slimy asparagus (talk) 18:24, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct @Slimy asparagus:. I obviously didn't look too closely when I rated the article. WP:WHACK!. —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:25, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So I guess we should change the project. Should we edit the first sentence first? I am nevous about how verified the change would be. Slimy asparagus (talk) 18:29, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BOLD. The one reference is about video games. If we are wrong then a better editor that us will fix the problem when they improve this article. —¿philoserf? (talk) 18:51, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]