Talk:Dolph (The Simpsons)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please share your thoughts here on the merge. Ohyeahmormons 19:26, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - he's a minor character, just a member of Jimbo's gang, Kearney (Simpsons) is proposed to merge also... - Adolphus79 06:52, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - For reasons stated on Kearney's talk page.Ohyeahmormons 13:58, 30 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose Although I may be in favor of merging all 3 of them (Dolph, Kearney, and Jimbo) into one article and renaming it (with their names redirecting to that article. --Ted87 15:47, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose Dolph must have an own page, he's NOT "just a memeber of Jimo's gang"
  • Oppose They are separate characters and I agree he isn't "just a member of Jimo's gang" All systems go 19:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose In any school gang there are always some characters quieter than others. Dolph has a presence and character of his own, although it would be nice to 'find out' a little more about him (or it would have been if The Simpsons hadn't been so appallingly shite since Series 10. If ever a show has gone from being so brilliant to so poor....) Martyn Smith 18:26, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose More and more, Dolph is becoming a character all his own. It's only a matter of time before there's an episode centered around him, and I'm looking forward to it! Dolphers 21:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]