Talk:Don Davis (North Carolina politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Donald G. Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Removing opinionated/biased content[edit]

This page had a large section of content written in a biased manner, in addition to lacking grammatical clarity and proper sourcing. Before adding this section or its contents back, please see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. -- Wiki9814 (talk) 06:51, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Wiki9814 I directly copy the source itself. Geeky1127 (talk) 23:47, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Fact is fact and Huffpost is a credible source.[edit]

Deleting fact by wrongly claim it is not well sourced should not be allowed. Geeky1127 (talk) 23:46, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Geeky, the source is fine but your edit itself was extremely poor quality, has a lot of grammatical errors, and is way too long for something cited to a single article (see WP:UNDUE). I also see that Wiki9814 clearly explained this in the revert. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 22:40, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then corect the grammar error instead of deleting vital information. Geeky1127 (talk) 00:35, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No. We are not going to clean up your mess. Your information is not "vital". Drmies (talk) 13:46, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]