Talk:Doncaster railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article lacks references.

Yorkshire High‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Doncaster railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Template Entry ?[edit]

I don't know how to edit the box to include it, but should Doncaster railway station be in the major UK rail stations list? It does, after all, have more regular services to more places than some of the stations currently in the list? Dbertman 22:12, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I replied to this on Dbertman's user talk page. However, it was removed, so I'll leave my response here instead. It read:

I saw the comment you left at Talk:Doncaster railway station. Please see Template talk:UK Major Railway Stations. There has been considerable debate about which stations to include on the template, after it grew too large and unwieldy. However, I would advise not to edit that template without first discussing it on its talk page. You'd make yourself very unpopular if you were to do that! --RFBailey 22:55, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--RFBailey 11:24, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong crash?[edit]

Your link, Main article: Doncaster rail crash, appears to relate to the bigger of the two incidents featured (9/8/47). But it links-thru to the lesser of the two (16/3/51). Are you sure that this link is the right one? Valetude (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Valetude: It's a hatnote, and as such, is placed before the material to which it relates. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 13:24, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]