Talk:Double truth

Philosophy: Epistemology / Religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Epistemology
	Philosophy of religion

Religion

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Who initiated this page? It is severely lacking sources and authentication. Please remove the page entirely if no more sources are added.Jslats (talk) 03:39, 20 September 2011 (UTC)jslats[reply]

Although the subject of this article is very interresting, I believe you should expand on Aquinas believing there can be no conflict between reason and faith. As is, the article seems to suggest that Aquinas says all articles of faith can be proved using reason, which is untrue. 18:25, 23 February 2014 (GMT+1) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A03F:4F4:ED00:7CEC:5D31:9D56:F2CA (talk)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Double truth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090506110552/http://etext.lib.virginia.edu:80/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv2-04 to http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv2-04

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:56, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]