Talk:Doug Burgum/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Doug Burgum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160215232447/http://www.ndhorizons.com/featured/index.asp?ID=16 to http://www.ndhorizons.com/featured/index.asp?ID=16
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160223144439/https://www.ndsu.edu/ndsu/news/magazine/vol01_issue02/burgum.html to http://www.ndsu.edu/ndsu/news/magazine/vol01_issue02/burgum.html
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.prairiebizmag.com/event/article/id/13202/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:27, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Utterly confusing table
The table at the end of the article, mentioning several politicians including Kamala Harris and Kristi Noem, and mentioning some things about precedence, is utterly confusing.
I stared at it for five minutes and have no idea what it is there for, or what information is actually contained in it.
I am sure that it is possible to design a table that is even more worthless than this one.
(I just can't think of how at the moment.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:200:c082:2ea0:4c85:97e8:e26a:8609 (talk)
- I agree that the "order of precedence" table is unnecessary, and have removed it. Walt Yoder (talk) 23:34, 18 May 2023 (UTC)