Talk:Doug Walters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Century in a session[edit]

I made this edit removing the mention that Walters hit a century in a session in Tests three times. He did it twice - v WI at Port of Spain, 1972-73 and v England, WACA, 1974-75 - but that seems to be about it.

The Oxford Companion to Australian Cricket does say that he did it thrice, the third one being against NZ in 1973-74 (Cricinfo might have got that info from there). I quote statistician Charles Davis, who has access to the scorebook the game : The scorebook of the Test that I have is unconventional, and lacks certain details, but it is clearly impossible for Walters to have scored 100 in a session. He came to the wicket at 11:34 and lunch was either 12:30 or 1:00. He took 158 minutes to reach 100. Walters did score 100 before lunch in one of the World XI matches in 1971/72 at Melbourne.

Charlie Wat's book "Australian First Class Cricket" (1993) lists all hundreds in a session in fcc by Australian batsmen. These are the occasions when KDW did so :

100 added to overnight score before lunch :

  • 2* to 104* (127), Aus v RoW, Melbourne, 1971-2 (day 5)

100 added between lunch and tea:

  • 100 (112), Aus v WI, P-o-S, 1972-73

100 added between tea and stumps :

  • 100 (100*) Aus v Northern Dist, 1973-74
  • 103*, Aus v Eng, Perth 1974-75.
Tintin (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Larrikin and ocker[edit]

Re [1], I am not for or against calling him that in the lead, but the article on Walters in Oxford Companion to Australian Cricket ends : "Walters, more than any other Australian cricketer of 1970s, epitomised popular "ocker" ideals". (Oxford Companion to Australian Cricketers, ed. Cashman, Franks, Maxwell, Stoddart, Weaver and Webster, Oxford Univerity Press, 1996, p.562) Tintin (talk) 02:56, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If he's ocker then he's ocker, but ocker is different from larrikin. One does not necessarily or even often have to be both. The Macquarie dictionary defines an ocker as an uncultivated Australian working man, who may or may not be boorish, uncouth and chauvinistic. There is currently a useless redirect on the Ocker page, I will have to start a proper entry on it. Grumpyyoungman01 06:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]



Doug Walters Stand has been ripped down at SCG and will be replaced by a newly-named stand

What? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.149.29.82 (talk) 12:55, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 11:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doug Walters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]