Talk:Dragon Quest Builders

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Ghosts (Pac-Man) (8 participants)
Midnight.works (5 participants)
Revenge of the Killer Robots from Hell (3 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (3 participants)
International Hobo (1 participant)
Wally Scharold (4 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (2 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (17 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

ZX Spectrum (nom)
Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
General Leo (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Missile Command 3D (nom)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (start)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Home Safety Hotline (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Virtual Boy Wario Land (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (start)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (start)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Shipment (Call of Duty) (start)
Fallout Online (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Square Enix Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Square Enix, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Square Enix-related merchandise and video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Square EnixWikipedia:WikiProject Square EnixTemplate:WikiProject Square EnixSquare Enix articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comparing this game to ActRaiser[edit]

Honestly in my opinion this game is closer to dark cloud than it is to minecraft or ActRaiser, but either way, the line, "according to Kotaku, Dragon Quest Builder is more akin to ActRaiser than Minecraft." is one guy's (incorrect) opinion. I honestly feel it's a little misleading, as DQB has portions of the game taken from each of those three. Minecraft's building, Dark Cloud's adventuring, quests, blueprints, and city construction, and very loosely ActRaiser's city siege by monsters. Either way, I think it's sufficient to list all three without opinions as to which one it is more like. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delerium76 (talk • contribs) 02:25, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Publisher is Nintendo, not Square Enix on Nintendo Switch[edit]

According to official Nintendo Website (https://www.nintendo.com/games/detail/dragon-quest-builders-switch) the game is published by Nintendo on Nintendo Switch, not by Square Enix. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ensink (talk • contribs) 13:38, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 September 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 10:11, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dragon Quest Builders: Alefgard o Fukkatsu Seyo → Dragon Quest Builders – Per WP:SUBTITLE and WP:COMMONNAME. Nearly all English-language reliable sources omit the subtitle. The1337gamer (talk) 13:56, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support as the page creator. --CAS222222221 (talk) 14:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Such plausibly uncontroversial moves should just be done, no need for an RM procedure if nobody's arguing. Per WP:BRD, if the move is reverted, an RM can then be started. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 15:43, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.