Talk:Dragonball Evolution (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Ghosts (Pac-Man) (8 participants)
Midnight.works (5 participants)
Revenge of the Killer Robots from Hell (3 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (3 participants)
International Hobo (1 participant)
Wally Scharold (4 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (2 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (17 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

ZX Spectrum (nom)
Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
General Leo (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Missile Command 3D (nom)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (start)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Home Safety Hotline (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Virtual Boy Wario Land (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (start)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (start)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Shipment (Call of Duty) (start)
Fallout Online (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

Deletion of article[edit]

Due to lack of notariety, I recommend this article be merged with Dragonball Evolution--FUNKAMATIC ~talk 04:35, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why, every video game based of a movie (visa versa) has its own article, why shouldn't this one have its own?--Megaman en m (talk) 08:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article had almost no information in it and a majority of what it did have was Gamecruft. When the section on the movie article gets to long, it can split off to its own article. BOVINEBOY2008 12:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest the change of the "reception" article...There are much more information about how fans are pissed, horrified and are hating this game, by the simple fact of hating that atrocious Dragon Ball Evolution movie itself. I am horrified by how some """"""fans"""""" of DB allow something like this - "Dragonball fans or fighting game fans owe it to themselves to at least rent this one" to be written here...No true DB fan would ever even touch that horrible piece of exploitation and childhood rape, therefore I don't see any logic there. I apology, and I know that this is wikipedia and here formality is very important and articles are not written by by emotions and personal opinion, but when men leaves his HEALTHY FEEL OF WHATS RIGHT AND WHATS CLEARLY WRONG, then he becomes a machine and not a person anymore. And DB fans edit this article in a first place, right? so who will write about the reception if not us? Therefore please consider this! Thank you for reading!--VEGETA_DTX (talk) 13:21, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The game has independent sources with significant coverage by reliable parties, so it meets the requirements of notability and the article should stay. Ham Pastrami (talk) 22:40, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]