Talk:Dreadnought (disambiguation)

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

patterned[edit]

Sorry to change this so soon after you made it. I'm being picky, but I think the use of the word "patterned" is confusing. When using that word about a battleship I would imagine it means the layout of guns. I assume this is not what you meant, as designs differed greatly and it would be wrong to suggest that all subsequent ships followed the same template. Wiki-Ed 12:42, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite alright, I simply wanted to clear out some of the clutter that was at the top of the Battleship article --Mmartins 13:32, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge request[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Dreadnought (disambiguation) and Dreadnaught should be merged or the content of the two should be clearly separated with "See also" links on each page. Yes? — AjaxSmack 00:24, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. Not fussed about which. The Land (talk) 09:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concur 143.250.2.10 (talk) 12:03, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree Dreadnaught1 (talk) 04:18, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge it the other way, to dreadnaught, as that's what's indicated on dreadnought and dreadnaut 70.51.11.206 (talk) 08:38, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- A common misspelling should be created as a redirect to the dab page, dreadnot. 70.51.11.206 (talk) 08:43, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - It is not a commons misspelling, there are several items that specifically use the "a" instead of the "o". 70.29.208.129 (talk) 09:18, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The two definitely should be merged.--Jeff79 (talk) 20:02, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I have merged this the other way, as the other dab page is more complete. 70.29.208.129 (talk) 09:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add article to list[edit]

Should the article on the Dreadnought hoax be added to this list? The article's url is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreadnought_hoax Bluemonkee (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]