Talk:Dreaming Out Loud

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Onerepublic dreamingoutloud.jpg[edit]

Image:Onerepublic dreamingoutloud.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:09, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Australian release date???[edit]

Does anyone know when this will be released in Australia?? Despite the fact the single is #1 and has been in the top 10 for 4 weeks; I can't find any release date scheduled for Australia. Nathan86 (talk) 05:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dreaming Out Loud or Dreaming out Loud?[edit]

Both are used and there should be consistency in the article. -Kraw Night (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

I added the Rolling Stone review yesterday. Other reviews of the album should also be added, since before I added the RS review, it seemed like critical reception was lukewarm, which is wrong. 68.183.182.60 (talk) 02:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Critical Reception[edit]

I thought the album didn't fare so well when I first glanced at the list of album reviews. It was, in fact, very misleading. In general the album was received very warmly by the critics.

Most of the reviews that were currently on the article were on the first page when I googled "Dreaming Out Loud Album Review", so I included the ones that were probably omitted to mislead some possible listeners.

I included all the ratings I found; bad, average and good (most of them were positive). You should google them for yourself if you're in doubt ;D UnkEdit (talk) 18:21, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dreaming Out Loud/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

That is not the official tack listing for their album "Dreaming out loud" that is their old album that wasn't released on a label.

Last edited at 01:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 13:49, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 22 July 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. SSTflyer 09:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]



– Album receives more than 96% of pageviews. Not even close.[1] Unreal7 (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support per nom. Page views have been consistant over the past year or so. [2] PC78 (talk) 22:55, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dreaming Out Loud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dreaming Out Loud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]