Talk:Drupal/Archives/2008/April

Is this discussion constructive?

This discussion is becoming unsavoury. Some of the criticisms of page content are legitimate, but are concerned with inappropriate content (to which all pages are prone) rather than the appropriateness of the page itself. More unpleasantly, many of the criticisms read like they were placed by the proponents of competing products, seeking to white-ant this product. It is hard to avoid the suspicion that the 'neutrality disputed' tag was inserted maliciously; the criticisms are certainly NOT neutral. Proclius (talk) 08:27, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm a Drupal developer and fan, and I have no problems with the criticism section (you were arguing that it is biased against Drupal, right?) It correctly identifies Drupal as having a higher learning curve than other systems (it's also more powerful) - not wholly unlike Linux - and as not using PHP's OOP mechanisms. It also highlights how the Drupal developers have worked to fix the former and make a good case for the latter. --- Arancaytar - avá artanhé (reply) 13:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)