Talk:Drupal/Archives/2011/August

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Good article nomination

I don't know enough about this sort of software to review the article. However I believe the lead section should give a description of what this software is for in terms that a person who has never installed, selected, or managed this kind of software would understand. It should not rely on links to other articles to describe the basic purpose of the software. Jc3s5h (talk) 13:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Drupal/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Waterfox ^~talk~ 21:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Status: Pass. — Waterfox ^~talk~ 22:23, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

I'll be revewing the article in the next few days. — Waterfox ^~talk~ 21:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Criterion

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass