Talk:Drupal/Archives/2013/January
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The biggest problems with the article, as I see them.
First off, I am a Drupal user.
That said, I'd like to offer a few issues to be considered on the article.
Section 6. Criticism - BIAS
There is no matching section on either the Wordpress or Joomla pages. These two CMS's are not without flaws of their own. Either the section deserves inclusion on other CMS pages, or removal from Drupal's page. If criticism is going to be allowed, there should be an effort to maintain fairness across the board, especially as those two pages are the only CMS's with greater market share.
(The criticisms are dated, to some extent, and not entirely version specific. [1], whose report is hosted as a node on drupal.org.)
The Drupal page should have a master page, and sub-pages that are version specific. There are still sites out there running Drupal 5.x (no longer supported), Drupal 6.x (previous version), Drupal 7.x (current). Drupal 8.x is in active development and nearing feature-freeze as I write this. Meaning that sites will begin the migration process to Drupal 8.x as soon as it goes into open beta sometime in 2013. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Simard (talk • contribs) 12:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- ^ They also depend mostly on a single-source, The University of Minnesota study